For Pip, she is the only narrator so we don’t get any insight on other characters and what they feel, rather we get an understanding on how Pip feels they feel. She will tell us how she sees the person expressing their emotion which isn’t an exact science and can complicate things if we don’t know what the other person is thinking. But, we can see certain flashbacks, but not with the usual definition of flashbacks. Instead of actually going back to the time and seeing the dialogue during that moment, we get information from people talking about the time and all the details they remember from that moment, so basically memories. Such as, “On Sunday afternoon me, Sal and his friends volunteered to help put up some missing posters…” Ravi explained what he remembered from years ago to the best of his ability. So in a way they are flashbacks but at the same time they are not. And for setting, the story is mostly set in the same place. Occasionally, there will be somewhere new but it's always the same town and normally it is set at Pip’s house because that is where she works on her Capstone project.
Along with all of these parts, the book is set up in an interesting way. Instead of just a novel, paragraphs through and through. The book will have your usual paragraphs and dialogue along with parts of interviews and Pip’s research paper. Like for the research paper every entry starts with “Pippa Fitz-Amobi” along with whatever the date is and then “Capstone Project Log—Entry…”). As you are reading and find that Pip is going to do an interview you get the transcript of the interview. Seeing this new set up immediately sucked me into the book. It made me feel like I helped conduct the interview and was there listening in on it. Another part of the story was seeing what Pip wrote down for the research paper. Every detail, note and lead for the investigation I got to see because Pip had an idea and put it down on paper. As an example Pip thinks, “I can’t believe I’m actually going to type this, but maybe Naomi had something to do with Andie… Or maybe I’m making something out of nothing. Either way, I think she has to go on the list” this shows what is going on in Pip’s mind by seeing her write it down on the paper. So I could keep all the leads in one place and could look back to what was written down and get back on track with Pip’s mindset.
Overall, the idea of the book’s set up is a fun and exciting way to execute a book. It keeps you interested and engaged, so you feel like you’re in the book solving the mystery with Pip. Every page has a new clue and adventure waiting for you to help uncover it. Everything about it is great besides there only being one point of view, being Pip’s. Even though it may fit the book better, it would be nice to understand what is actually going on in other characters' minds instead of just getting a guess from Pip. And finally the comedy and mystery really adds an extra piece to the book to wrap it all up in a neat little package.
Emma this book sounds really cool! I like the use of all the examples you put into this. They help to recognize exactly what you mean. Your concluding paragraph did a great job of wrapping up the argument you make, I especially like how you executed your counter argument in that section. I would love to read this book, and I'm sure others would as well. I'm curious though, are there any smaller parts that you disliked about the book? Or was Pips POV being the only POV all you disliked?
ReplyDeleteEmma, your explanation of "A Good Girl's Guide to Murder" is really great! I think your description of the author's different writing style was really neat. I made me want to pick the book up and never put it down! You should remember to cite your quotes when you use passages directly form the book so we know which pages the quotes are from.
ReplyDeleteI've heard a lot of good things about this book, and after reading your analysis, I can understand why. The different styles of writing (i.e. not-so flashbacky flashbacks, Pip's notes, interview transcripts) seem new and very intriguing. I can see why many people recommend this book. Now I want to read it!
ReplyDeleteI have read this book and I agree that this book keeps you engaged. There are many discoveries and turning points that make the book so great. I like your idea of pip not getting all the narration. I think it would have been helpful if we got to see others perspectives.
ReplyDelete